Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Targeted human amplicon, Illumina NextSeq 500. A-grade (100/100) with excellent measured metrics: Q30=96.9%, adapters=0%, across 1.4B reads. Duplication=98.98% is expected and acceptable for deep-coverage targeted sequencing. **Caution:** mean_target_coverage (893×) is extrapolated rather than measured, making evidence_strength provisional; validate measured coverage depth independently before committed reuse.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0