Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mouse gut metagenome amplicon sequencing. Poor quality: Q30 bases 37.5% (critical failure at 0/100 weight)—majority of bases below confidence threshold—combined with extreme 96.92% duplication (PCR/sequencing artifacts). Not suitable for variant or taxonomic inference without major sequence filtering; reuse not recommended.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0