Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRP102895

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

WGS from L. plantarum; A-grade (99/100). Identical quality profile to PRJNA381357 (9.09% duplication, Q39.3 mean, 150bp reads) indicates same sample preparation; excellent for all downstream applications including SNV/indel discovery and population genomics.

Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
2 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 1091053406 reported
total reads 1595529 reported
n content pct 0.002 measured
pct q20 bases 98.6 measured
pct q30 bases 95.6 measured
gc content pct 44.5 measured
mean read length 150 measured
mean base quality 39.3 measured
adapter content pct 0.04 measured
duplication rate pct 9.09 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.6 measured ×1 100%
duplication rate pct 9.09 measured ×0.5 97%
adapter content pct 0.04 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 28 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 68