← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Prunus persica var. persica
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
12 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
7904343662
reported
total reads
155010375
reported
n content pct
0.005
measured
pct q20 bases
80.2
measured
pct q30 bases
56.8
measured
gc content pct
48.3
measured
mean read length
51
measured
mean base quality
27.3
measured
adapter content pct
0.03
measured
duplication rate pct
13.3
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
56.8
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
27.3
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
0.03
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
13.3
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
16 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0