← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
57/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 1000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
5 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
11.44
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
59059739701
reported
total reads
311399031
reported
n content pct
0.625
measured
sampled bases
101000000
measured
sampled reads
1000000
measured
gc content pct
51.3
measured
polyg tail pct
0.03
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
0
measured
read length max
101
measured
read length min
101
measured
read length n50
101
measured
max base quality
4
measured
mean read length
101
measured
max n pct per pos
0.89
measured
mean base quality
4
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
101
measured
adapter content pct
1.31
measured
median read quality
4
measured
duplication rate pct
11.89
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.11
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 57/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean base quality
4
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
1.31
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
11.89
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
36 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0