Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human gut 16S amplicon, Illumina MiSeq. A-grade (91/100) with clean library (0.01% adapters) and Q30=87.3% (adequate for taxonomic assignment). Duplication=95.67% is inherent to amplicon assays and does not penalize reusability; read length (251 bp) provides excellent 16S V4/V5 resolution. Suitable for reuse in microbiome profiling and comparative studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0