SRP113601

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

36/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Camellia sinensis

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

4 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 9605492135 reported

total reads 166429720 reported

n content pct 11.951 measured

pct q20 bases 81.6 measured

pct q30 bases 75.2 measured

gc content pct 43.4 measured

mean read length 59.2 measured

mean base quality 29.8 measured

adapter content pct 1.02 measured

duplication rate pct 72.59 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 36/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 75.2 measured ×1 26%

mean base quality 29.8 measured ×0.6 30%

adapter content pct 1.02 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 72.59 measured ×0.4 5%

QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0