Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human gut 16S amplicon, Illumina MiSeq. A-grade (100/100) with high base quality (Q30=97.3%, mean BQ=37.9) and zero adapters across 26M reads. Mean read length 339 bp (longer than standard V4 amplicons) improves taxonomic discrimination; duplication=95.23% is expected and acceptable for amplicon. Excellent for reuse in detailed microbiome profiling.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0