SRP119022

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

89/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Mus musculus

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

46 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 6168818674500.001 reported

total reads 20562728915 reported

mean coverage 2284.7 extrapolated

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 98.2 measured

pct q30 bases 95.5 measured

gc content pct 39.6 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 39.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.09 measured

duplication rate pct 29.76 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 89/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 2284.7 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 95.5 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 29.76 measured ×0.5 32%

adapter content pct 0.09 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 38 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0