← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escovopsis sp. Ae733
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
2 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
5683623418
reported
total reads
11321959
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
100
measured
pct q30 bases
100
measured
gc content pct
43.7
measured
mean read length
251
measured
mean base quality
30
measured
adapter content pct
52.04
measured
duplication rate pct
4.11
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 79/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
100
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
4.11
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
52.04
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
30 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0