SRP121089

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Targeted human amplicon, Illumina MiniSeq. A-grade (100/100) with strong measured quality: Q30=96.7%, adapters=0.81%, across 7.3M reads. Duplication=97.78% is inherent to targeted amplicon. **Caution:** mean_target_coverage (35.5×) is extrapolated, making evidence_strength provisional; validate actual sequencing depth independently before committed use in applications requiring high-depth uniformity.

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina MiniSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

72 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2200106201 reported

total reads 7317797 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 97.3 measured

pct q30 bases 96.7 measured

gc content pct 45.5 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 37.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.81 measured

duplication rate pct 97.78 measured

mean target coverage 35.5 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.7 measured ×1 100%

adapter content pct 0.81 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 6 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0