SRP124981

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Mus musculus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

35 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 4682414172122.001 reported

total reads 16631145639 reported

n content pct 0.008 measured

pct q20 bases 96.7 measured

pct q30 bases 92.7 measured

gc content pct 42.4 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 38.4 measured

adapter content pct 0.15 measured

duplication rate pct 7.56 measured

mean target coverage 86711.4 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.7 measured ×1 100%

adapter content pct 0.15 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0