SRP129888

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

74/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

pig gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

112 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1336272548 reported

total reads 5596618 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 99.3 measured

pct q30 bases 98.5 measured

gc content pct 53.6 measured

mean read length 252.7 measured

mean base quality 38.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 96.22 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 74/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 98.5 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 96.22 measured ×0.5 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 3 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0