SRP130621

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

60/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq from Homo sapiens on HiSeq 2000 with >3 billion reads and moderate quality (92.6% Q20, 87.1% Q30), providing extensive transcriptome coverage suitable for comprehensive expression profiling despite slightly lower per-base quality.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

44 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 887132277672 reported

total reads 3015029677 reported

n content pct 0.004 measured

pct q20 bases 92.6 measured

pct q30 bases 87.1 measured

gc content pct 55.7 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 33.2 measured

adapter content pct 25.5 measured

duplication rate pct 68.78 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 60/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 87.1 measured ×1 86%

mean base quality 33.2 measured ×0.6 87%

adapter content pct 25.5 measured ×0.4 0%

duplication rate pct 68.78 measured ×0.4 14%

QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0