SRP132473

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Mus musculus whole-exome capture. Excellent measured quality: Q30 94.8%, base quality 38.8, duplication 3.62%; mean target coverage 2914× extrapolated but phenomenally high. Evidence strength 0.61 due to coverage extrapolation, but depth is so strong the confidence is justified. Ready for variant discovery.

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Mus musculus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

12 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 157363692096 reported

total reads 1035287448 reported

n content pct 0.023 measured

pct q20 bases 98.1 measured

pct q30 bases 94.8 measured

gc content pct 40.7 measured

mean read length 76 measured

mean base quality 38.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 3.62 measured

mean target coverage 2914.1 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean target coverage 2914.1 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 94.8 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 3.62 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 40 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0