SRP133785

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

78/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq from Rosa species on HiSeq 3000 with >299 million reads and good quality (96.8% Q20, 91.6% Q30), providing comprehensive floral transcriptome data for ornamental plant genetics.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Rosa

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 3000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

12 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 90349398890 reported

total reads 299170195 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 96.8 measured

pct q30 bases 91.6 measured

gc content pct 51.1 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 38.1 measured

adapter content pct 8.29 measured

duplication rate pct 75.67 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 78/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91.6 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 38.1 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 8.29 measured ×0.4 65%

duplication rate pct 75.67 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0