SRP135707

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

98/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Topaza pella

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

9 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 7462021640 reported

total reads 15532306 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 94.9 measured

pct q30 bases 92.9 measured

gc content pct 42.6 measured

mean read length 239.9 measured

mean base quality 36.5 measured

adapter content pct 0.29 measured

duplication rate pct 14.44 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 98/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.9 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 14.44 measured ×0.5 93%

adapter content pct 0.29 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0