SRP136063

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

ATAC-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

3 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 89467745990 reported

total reads 296604180 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 100 measured

pct q30 bases 100 measured

gc content pct 44.1 measured

mean read length 150.7 measured

mean base quality 40.7 measured

adapter content pct 27.93 measured

duplication rate pct 24.44 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ATAC-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 100 measured ×1 100%

QC cost 30 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0