SRP145556
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
61/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This is sediment metagenome amplicon sequencing. The D grade is driven by an extremely high duplication rate of 92.6%—with 30,715 total reads, that means only ~2,400 truly unique sequences, which severely limits your ability to resolve taxa accurately. This duplication likely reflects PCR over-amplification or insufficient complexity in your sample, and could introduce compositional bias into any community profiling analysis you run.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0