SRP150893

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

74/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Whole-exome sequencing of pig gut metagenome on HiSeq 2500 with ~2.5 million reads and good quality (96.9% Q20, 91.2% Q30), representing targeted capture data suitable for variant discovery in agricultural metagenomics.

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

pig gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

48 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 747795855 reported

total reads 2567560 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 96.9 measured

pct q30 bases 91.2 measured

gc content pct 51.1 measured

mean read length 281.4 measured

mean base quality 35.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 94.83 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 74/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91.2 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 94.83 measured ×0.5 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 4 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0