SRP151125

ENA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

90/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

40 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 16527130186 reported

total reads 58823841 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 96.3 measured

pct q30 bases 95.3 measured

gc content pct 49 measured

mean read length 281 measured

mean base quality 36.9 measured

adapter content pct 5.18 measured

duplication rate pct 62.27 measured

mean target coverage 266.6 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 90/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.3 measured ×1 100%

adapter content pct 5.18 measured ×0.5 70%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0