SRP152498

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

42/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Pooled clone sequencing of gut metagenome on MiSeq with ~1.2 million reads and moderate quality (89.2% Q20, 78.1% Q30), enabling microbiota assessment using a culture-dependent approach with acknowledged quality limitations.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

23 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 735583047 reported

total reads 1222294 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 89.2 measured

pct q30 bases 78.1 measured

gc content pct 54.8 measured

mean read length 301 measured

mean base quality 32.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 92.91 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 42/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 78.1 measured ×1 41%

duplication rate pct 92.91 measured ×0.5 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 4 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0