SRP152866

ENA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

79/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Metagenomic whole-genome sequencing of gut microbiome. Grade C with score 79/100—usable but not premium. Q30 (83.2%) is respectable for microbial profiling and duplication (11.4%) is well-controlled; however, this falls short of A-tier quality and may require careful filtering for rare-variant analysis or low-abundance taxon recovery.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

gut metagenome

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

49 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 287780318528 reported

total reads 2058624828 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 90.2 measured

pct q30 bases 83.2 measured

gc content pct 43.3 measured

mean read length 144.2 measured

mean base quality 32.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 11.42 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 79/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 83.2 measured ×1 66%

duplication rate pct 11.42 measured ×0.5 89%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 36 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0