Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-exome capture sequencing of maize genome. Grade B with score 83/100; provisional reading pending measured confirmation. Extrapolated target coverage (1559.6×) is exceptional and base quality is high (Q30=90.5%), but 51% duplication indicates overamplification; evidence_strength=0.61 requires verification of on-target metrics before reuse commitment.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0