Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRP167424

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq (Locusta migratoria, HiSeq X Ten) with perfect A-grade score (100/100). Industry-leading base quality (Q30 96.2%, mean 39.5), long reads (150bp), zero adapter content, and moderate duplication (29.36%) enable robust isoform and low-abundance transcript detection. Highly reusable for expression profiling.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Locusta migratoria
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
15 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 88033025100 reported
total reads 293443417 reported
n content pct 0.002 measured
pct q20 bases 98.7 measured
pct q30 bases 96.2 measured
gc content pct 43.9 measured
mean read length 150 measured
mean base quality 39.5 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 29.36 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.2 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 39.5 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 29.36 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 11 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 flagged mean score 60