Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRP193469

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Human amplicon sequencing on MiSeq with 3.32 million 146.5 bp reads achieving perfect 100% Q20 and Q30 across 975 Mb indicates exceptional instrument performance or post-processing. The 41.3% GC and perfect basecall accuracy enable comprehensive and error-free target amplicon profiling; suitable for clinical diagnostics, rare-variant detection, or highly sensitive mutation screening.

Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
23 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 975942342 reported
total reads 3317977 reported
n content pct 0.064 measured
pct q20 bases 100 measured
pct q30 bases 100 measured
gc content pct 41.3 measured
mean read length 146.5 measured
mean base quality 30 measured
adapter content pct 0.05 measured
duplication rate pct 97.24 measured
mean target coverage 15.7 extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 100 measured ×1 100%
adapter content pct 0.05 measured ×0.5 100%
QC cost 2 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 89