← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
342 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1541753248750
reported
total reads
5502671604
reported
n content pct
0.005
measured
pct q20 bases
98.1
measured
pct q30 bases
93.8
measured
gc content pct
52.7
measured
mean read length
144.1
measured
mean base quality
38.8
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
53.42
measured
mean target coverage
24867
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 84/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean target coverage
24867
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
93.8
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
53.42
measured
×0.5
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
36 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0