SRR004074

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

29/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Human whole-genome, Illumina GA2. Unfit for use: mean coverage 0.3× extrapolated (0/100 score, weight 1.2) plus Q30 42.1% measured failure. Evidence strength 0.61; coverage is provisional. No realistic pathway to variant calls—reuse not feasible.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer II

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 880353648 reported

total reads 12227134 reported

mean coverage 0.3 extrapolated

n content pct 0.38 measured

pct q20 bases 51.4 measured

pct q30 bases 42.1 measured

gc content pct 39 measured

mean read length 36 measured

mean base quality 22.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.58 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 29/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 0.3 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 42.1 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 0.58 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0