SRR004076

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

29/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Whole-genome sequencing of human with minimal sequencing depth. Grade F with score 29/100; provisional reading pending measured confirmation. Extrapolated coverage (0.3×) is far below even draft-assembly minimums, and Q30 (29.5%) is extremely poor; evidence_strength=0.61 and this dataset is essentially unusable for any quantitative genomic application without extensive resequencing.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer II

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 968137056 reported

total reads 13446348 reported

mean coverage 0.3 extrapolated

n content pct 0.32 measured

pct q20 bases 39.6 measured

pct q30 bases 29.5 measured

gc content pct 39 measured

mean read length 36 measured

mean base quality 18.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.48 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 29/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 0.3 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 29.5 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 0.48 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0