SRR006433

ENA first seen 2012

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

29/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Human whole-exome sequencing, 454 platform. Dual failure: Q30 49.6% (measured, 0/100) and mean target coverage 13.2× extrapolated (0/100, weight 1.2). Evidence strength 0.61; coverage reading is provisional pending direct measurement. Insufficient depth for clinical-grade variant calls; deep re-assessment needed.

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

454 GS FLX

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 817274562 reported

total reads 1525085 reported

n content pct 0.046 measured

pct q20 bases 81.6 measured

pct q30 bases 49.6 measured

gc content pct 42.9 measured

mean read length 353.1 measured

mean base quality 27.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 8.24 measured

mean target coverage 13.2 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 29/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean target coverage 13.2 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 49.6 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 8.24 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0