Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
50/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human whole-genome sequencing. Critically underpowered: mean coverage extrapolated at 0.7× (0/100 score, weight 1.2)—insufficient for reliable variant detection at >99% confidence. Evidence strength 0.61; deep measured pass pending. Reuse only for extremely rare-variant screening or non-SNP features.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0