Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
58/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read WGS of E. coli B REL606 from an Illumina Genome Analyzer, capturing ~286 Mb with 74% of bases at Q30. The data is well-suited for comparative genomics or resolving SNPs and indels in this laboratory strain, though the modest coverage and older platform should be considered when planning de novo assembly or detecting rare variants.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0