Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
31/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Drosophila pseudoobscura bulk RNA-seq with complete base quality failure (Grade F, 31/100). Zero percent of bases pass Q30 and mean quality is only 23.2—both fail completely—rendering the dataset unsuitable for standard expression or variant analysis. Not suitable for reuse without re-sequencing validation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0