← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
32/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Drosophila pseudoobscura
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
11.15
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
223967988
reported
total reads
6221333
reported
n content pct
0.002
measured
pct q20 bases
81.7
measured
pct q30 bases
0
measured
pct reads q30
0
measured
sampled bases
36000000
measured
sampled reads
1000000
measured
gc content pct
47.5
measured
polyg tail pct
0.01
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-8
measured
read length max
36
measured
read length min
36
measured
read length n50
36
measured
max base quality
30
measured
mean read length
36
measured
max n pct per pos
0.053
measured
mean base quality
23.9
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
100
measured
read length median
36
measured
adapter content pct
0.02
measured
median read quality
24.4
measured
duplication rate pct
33.27
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.09
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 32/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
0
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
23.9
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
0.02
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
33.27
measured
×0.4
93%
QC cost
24 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0