← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Drosophila pseudoobscura
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
10.91
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
67882896
reported
total reads
1885636
reported
n content pct
0.152
measured
pct q20 bases
75.1
measured
pct q30 bases
0
measured
pct reads q30
0
measured
sampled bases
36000000
measured
sampled reads
1000000
measured
gc content pct
40.3
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-10.1
measured
read length max
36
measured
read length min
36
measured
read length n50
36
measured
max base quality
30
measured
mean read length
36
measured
max n pct per pos
0.418
measured
mean base quality
22.2
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
100
measured
read length median
36
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
22.5
measured
duplication rate pct
26.7
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.09
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
0
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
22.2
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
26.7
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
54 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0