← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
52/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Drosophila mojavensis
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
11.96
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
225452484
reported
total reads
6262569
reported
n content pct
0.007
measured
pct q20 bases
80.4
measured
sampled bases
36000000
measured
sampled reads
1000000
measured
gc content pct
46.8
measured
polyg tail pct
0.01
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-5.6
measured
read length max
36
measured
read length min
36
measured
read length n50
36
measured
max base quality
28
measured
mean read length
36
measured
max n pct per pos
0.052
measured
mean base quality
22.9
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
100
measured
read length median
36
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
23.4
measured
duplication rate pct
37.66
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.86
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 52/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean base quality
22.9
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
37.66
measured
×0.4
83%
QC cost
28 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0