SRR037509

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

33/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk short-read RNA-seq with catastrophic basecall quality (Q30=52.5%, mean Q=26.6, both scored 0/100) rendering the dataset unsuitable for reliable analysis. Old platform (Genome Analyzer II) and very short reads (36 bp) compound systematic base-quality failure indicating platform degradation. Not recommended for reuse.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Drosophila mojavensis

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer II

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 122546412 reported

total reads 3404067 reported

n content pct 0.092 measured

pct q20 bases 84.3 measured

pct q30 bases 52.5 measured

gc content pct 40.6 measured

mean read length 36 measured

mean base quality 26.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 29.85 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 52.5 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 26.6 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 29.85 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 28 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0