Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
35/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read bulk RNA-seq from maize (Zea mays, likely same experiment as SRR039506). Grade F; Q30 61.8% and mean base quality 28.3 fail expression standards, suggesting library degradation. Short 35 bp reads and low base quality limit mapping reliability and transcript quantification. Paired failure; reuse not recommended.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0