SRR069520

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

29/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Whole-genome human sequencing from short-read platform. Grade F with score 29/100; provisional reading pending measured confirmation. Low extrapolated coverage (7.2×) and marginal Q30 (60.2%) together render this underpowered for reliable variant detection; evidence_strength=0.61 reflects dependence on extrapolated metrics requiring validation.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 22449542094 reported

total reads 111136347 reported

mean coverage 7.2 extrapolated

n content pct 2.417 measured

pct q20 bases 67.9 measured

pct q30 bases 60.2 measured

gc content pct 39.6 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 25.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 4.78 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 29/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 7.2 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 60.2 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 4.78 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0