SRR071605

ENA first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

77/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Oreochromis niloticus

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer II

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 6772000712 reported

total reads 33524756 reported

n content pct 0.744 measured

pct q20 bases 87.3 measured

pct q30 bases 83.4 measured

gc content pct 41.2 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 29.5 measured

adapter content pct 4.64 measured

duplication rate pct 4.83 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 77/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 83.4 measured ×1 67%

duplication rate pct 4.83 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 4.64 measured ×0.4 74%

QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0