SRR072232

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 4 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

60/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

mixed DNA library

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 648159368 reported

total reads 1225169 reported

n content pct 0.007 measured

pct q20 bases 91.4 measured

pct q30 bases 77.9 measured

gc content pct 38.3 measured

mean read length 400.9 measured

mean base quality 34.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 18.49 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 60/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 77.9 measured ×1 40%

duplication rate pct 18.49 measured ×0.5 67%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 13 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0