Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read bulk RNA-seq from beetle (Tribolium castaneum) using AB SOLiD (colorspace platform, 2007-era). Grade F; essentially unusable—Q30 0.8%, mean base quality 13.8 (noise level), and GC content 0% (platform encoding artifact). SOLiD's two-base colorspace encoding failed spectacularly in this sample. Not recommended without platform-specific recovery tools.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0