← Dataset search
SRR10001319
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
373156605
reported
total reads
790337
reported
mean coverage
81.1
extrapolated
n content pct
0.007
measured
pct q20 bases
96.5
measured
pct q30 bases
94.6
measured
gc content pct
51.9
measured
mean read length
235.6
measured
mean base quality
36.5
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
8.9
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
81.1
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
94.6
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
8.9
measured
×0.5
97%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
23 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0