← Dataset search
SRR10010920
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
260727741
reported
total reads
1301798
reported
mean coverage
56.7
extrapolated
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
97.2
measured
pct q30 bases
94.8
measured
gc content pct
49.3
measured
mean read length
100.1
measured
mean base quality
37.5
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
16.97
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 95/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
56.7
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
94.8
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
16.97
measured
×0.5
72%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
24 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0