Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read bulk RNA-seq from invasive fruit fly (Drosophila suzukii) on HiSeq 2000. Grade A; excellent quality with Q30 89.5%, mean base quality 34.9, low duplication (24.17%), and minimal adapter content (0.45%). High read depth (37.8M reads, 100 bp each) and consistent metrics across all dimensions. Highly suitable for expression profiling and genome annotation.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0