Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read bulk RNA-seq from silkworm (Bombyx mori). Grade A; excellent quality with Q30 95% and mean base quality 36.2 on modern NovaSeq 6000. Only minor concern is 50.27% duplication, acceptable for RNA (biological + library artifact). High depth (20.8M reads, 150 bp) supports robust expression quantification; highly recommended for reuse.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0