Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Near-reference-quality bulk short-read RNA-seq with excellent basecall accuracy (Q30=94.4%, mean Q=36) and very deep sequencing (9.1 Gb, 30M reads). Duplication at 34.56% (scored 90/100, weight 0.4) is a minor limitation; long reads (151 bp) support high-confidence mapping. Ideal for isoform-level expression and transcript discovery.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0