SRR1005880

ENA first seen 2013

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

65/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Salvia miltiorrhiza RNA-seq from 454 GS FLX platform (longer reads) with ~926k reads and moderate quality (Q30: 75.8%), useful for full-length transcript discovery despite lower throughput and read quality than Illumina alternatives. Note: read type is not explicitly reported.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Salvia miltiorrhiza

Instrument

454 GS FLX

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 296539850 reported

total reads 926415 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 93.1 measured

pct q30 bases 75.8 measured

gc content pct 45.6 measured

mean read length 323.8 measured

mean base quality 33.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 44.7 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 65/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 75.8 measured ×1 29%

mean base quality 33.9 measured ×0.6 98%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 44.7 measured ×0.4 67%

QC cost 21 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0