Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk short-read RNA-seq with exceptional basecall quality (Q30=97.4%, mean Q=39.8) and long reads (146.7 bp) supporting accurate alignment and transcript discovery. Higher technical duplication at 53.18% (scored 48/100, weight 0.4) is the primary limitation but acceptable with normalization. Excellent for isoform characterization and expression studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0