Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq X short-read bulk RNA-seq; grade A, recommended for reuse. Exceptional base quality (Q30=97.2%, mean BQ=39.7) supports robust transcript discovery; elevated duplication (54.12%) may reduce sensitivity for low-abundance isoforms but permits high-confidence quantification of moderately-abundant transcripts.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0